ClearMath is a comprehensive mathematics curriculum that integrates classroom instruction with the MATHia® digital learning platform. Lessons combine collaborative learning, teacher-facilitated instruction, and individualized digital practice to develop conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application. The program includes embedded assessments, instructional supports, and planning resources designed to inform ongoing instruction.

ClearMath California offers a structured framework for scaffolding and differentiation that is integrated into the core lesson design. Differentiation Strategies, Purposeful Questions, Mathematical Language Routines (MLR) integration, and the Concept/Re-Engagement lesson cycle each serve distinct functions in supporting diverse learners. Most lessons offer "Language Links" and other features that leverage students' prior knowledge and lived experiences as valuable assets.


In ClearMath California, students are expected to grapple with worthwhile mathematical problems that invite investigation, discussion, and reflection. The tasks are designed to be unpacked over time, encouraging students to make connections, test ideas, and justify their thinking as they develop mathematical understanding. Teacher guidance focuses on noticing and responding to student thinking, helping students build understanding through discussion while keeping the intellectual work centered on students.


Assessment for ClearMath California is designed as a continuous decision-making process. Evidence collected throughout the instructional cycle is paired with tools that help teachers interpret student understanding, identify instructional priorities, and determine next steps while engaging students in monitoring their own learning and progress. Assessment information from classroom activities and MATHia provides multiple sources of evidence that teachers can use when planning instruction and targeted support.


ClearMath California provides planning across TK–8 and is organized around a consistent instructional framework. Each lesson begins with learning goals, content connections, language goals, and learning prompts that help teachers establish the mathematical purpose, activate prior learning, identify language demands, and communicate clear expectations for what students will investigate and understand. This consistent structure makes it easier for teachers to navigate the curriculum while maintaining coherence across grades


Across the units and lessons reviewed, materials did not consistently include explicit guidance for implementing accommodations in assessments such as oral responses, extended time, or the use of manipulatives while preserving the intended mathematical learning goal. Districts may wish to establish local guidance to support equitable, UDL-aligned assessment practices.

In the middle grades, in particular, is integrate into MATHia with assessment, intervention, and personalized learning. Districts should establish clear expectations for student use, data review, and instructional decision-making, while considering technology access, scheduling, and professional learning needed to implement the digital component consistently.
The breadth of digital tools, embedded resources, and planning components may require intentional onboarding to ensure teachers can navigate and prioritize materials effectively. District review teams should examine how easily teachers can locate, prioritize, and adapt materials within the platform.
To learn more about Professional Learning offerings for this program, please visit the publisher website and view the California Professional Learning Partner Guide (PLPG) which provides a vetted list of top organizations offering high-quality, curriculum-aligned professional learning services.
Both IMKH and Classroom Mathematics California are aligned to the California Math Framework and support conceptual understanding and mathematical reasoning, but they differ in structure and implementation design. The strongest choice will always depend on local needs, professional learning structures, the level of instructional coherence already in place and the evidence collected during the review.
AI-generated content is intended to support exploration, not replace district evaluation.
Between the Greens is designed to present narrative, expert-informed profiles of highly rated curriculum options. These do not evaluate effectiveness, assign ratings, or make adoption recommendations and should be considered alongside local priorities and additional committee review.
This report was created independently and was not written or sponsored by curriculum publishers.